<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Lifetime of Movie Lovin&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collegeavenuemag.com/entertainment/a-lifetime-of-movie-lovin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collegeavenuemag.com/entertainment/a-lifetime-of-movie-lovin/</link>
	<description>Rocky Mountain Student Media Corp.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 16:10:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clarence</title>
		<link>http://www.collegeavenuemag.com/entertainment/a-lifetime-of-movie-lovin/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collegeavenuemag.com/?p=419#comment-170</guid>
		<description>These are good points that Stacey made.

 I think that films appeal to personal taste and experience. Different viewers can have radically different responses to the same movie. And this has always struck me as surprising.  

I have always thought that movies were an expression of style and substance combined. We can appreciate a movie that isnt necessarily outstanding in substance-but the style of the movie makes up for it. Or substance can make up for style .

I suspect that Hollywood is making a mistake with most of today&#039;s movies--too much money thrown at the big name actors-and too little money offered to the writers. The writer is the soul of the movie-the actors are just tools to express this soul.  

And by the way-that Father of Stacey&#039;s sure sounds like a &quot;character&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are good points that Stacey made.</p>
<p> I think that films appeal to personal taste and experience. Different viewers can have radically different responses to the same movie. And this has always struck me as surprising.  </p>
<p>I have always thought that movies were an expression of style and substance combined. We can appreciate a movie that isnt necessarily outstanding in substance-but the style of the movie makes up for it. Or substance can make up for style .</p>
<p>I suspect that Hollywood is making a mistake with most of today&#8217;s movies&#8211;too much money thrown at the big name actors-and too little money offered to the writers. The writer is the soul of the movie-the actors are just tools to express this soul.  </p>
<p>And by the way-that Father of Stacey&#8217;s sure sounds like a &#8220;character&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
